Values Institute
All insights
CultureJune 12, 2023

A Guide to the Values of 9 World Empires

In this article, you'll learn

  • The six recurring values that show up again and again across history's greatest empires
  • How Persia balanced tolerance and centralised command with its diversity in counsel motto
  • Why ancient Greek glory, loyalty and kindness shaped a culture still felt today
  • What Rome, the Mongols and the British reveal about power, faith and organization

Common values keep showing up when you look across the great empires: military strength, strong leadership, cultural or religious unity, economic prosperity, intellect, innovation. Say those words fast enough and they sound like a checklist. They aren't. Each empire weighted them differently, and each had its own version of the ugly side too — cruelty, exploitation, oppression. No empire gets to skip that part of the story.

Most successful empires had strong, charismatic leaders who could inspire loyalty and respect. Most also had powerful, well-trained armies, because conquering and holding territory takes more than good intentions. Many were built on a shared religious or cultural identity that gave people a sense of purpose bigger than themselves. The ones that lasted tended to have thriving economies — agriculture, trade, industry, often some combination of all three. And a few, the Greeks and Romans especially, are remembered as much for their ideas as their armies: philosophy, science, the arts.

Here's a closer look at the values behind some of the greatest empires history has produced.

The Persian empire

Cyrus the Great founded the Persian Empire around 550 BC. Before him, the region was a patchwork of semi-nomadic tribes — he's the one who pulled them together under his rule. The heart of it all was Persia, roughly where Iran sits today.

The empire spanned major regions of the Middle East and the Mediterranean, and its rulers made a deliberate choice: tolerate the religions of the people you've conquered, even while keeping Zoroastrianism as the official faith. Like most societies of that era, it was highly stratified. Structure and openness, side by side.

Connection

This value pushed the empire toward real commercial ambition. The Persians built roads and bridges to link their far-flung territories — infrastructure as a values statement, if you like.

Tolerance

The Persians accepted the cultures of the people they conquered, unique features and all. A phrase often attributed to Cyrus the Great — "diversity in counsel, unity in command" — captures that approach well, even if its exact ancient origin is hard to pin down. Different voices in the room, one decision at the end. It's a harder balance to strike than it sounds.

The Greek empire

Ancient Greece still shapes how we live now — a lot of modern law and ethics traces straight back to it. The Greeks built their daily life around four values in particular: kindness, loyalty, education, and glory. Simple words. They did a lot of work.

Education

In Athens and many other city-states, boys were home-schooled until about six or seven, then sent to formal school, where they stayed until around 14, with the option of a few more years after that. Schools taught civil society and the arts — training for the two states of life a Greek man could expect: peace and war. Sparta, though, went its own way: it was a militarised city-state that pulled boys from the home entirely at age seven for state training.

Glory

Glory, in ancient Greece, was something like today's fame — but with higher stakes. Young men chased the recognition that came with war and victory, because the Greeks believed the soul descended to the underworld, Hades, after death, and only those who'd achieved glory on Earth got any privileges once they got there. Your reputation didn't end when you did.

Kindness

Judging by Homer's Odyssey, helping strangers was close to a civic duty. Odysseus travels far and wide and constantly needs help from people who owe him nothing — and in the poem, Greeks are consistently hospitable, offering shelter, food, and protection without asking questions first.

Maybe some of that kindness came from fear — the gods might punish you if you weren't hospitable. Maybe it was more aspiration than instinct. Either way, it's a value the Greeks still hold up collectively today.

Loyalty

And then loyalty, which might be the value doing the most work of all. Almost every act in ancient Greek life traces back to it — loyalty to the gods, to family, to community.

Loyalty to the gods meant accepting their decisions without question. Loyalty to the community meant showing up with food, shelter, or money for someone in need, and standing between your neighbors and their enemies. Loyalty to family meant doing whatever served the family's interest — unless it cost you favor with the gods. The Greeks believed the gods tested people by sending hardship their way, and enduring that hardship was, itself, an act of loyalty.

The Roman empire

Rome managed something few empires manage: counting its continuation as the Byzantine Empire, it survived for over a millennium — though the vast territories of its peak were only held for a few centuries before shrinking dramatically. Military strength mattered, obviously. But it wasn't the only ingredient. Culture and religion did real work too, drawing conquered peoples toward adopting Rome's sophisticated, classical way of life rather than merely submitting to it.

Rome took Greek philosophy, architecture, and science and carried it forward for future generations. It also embraced Christianity — and in doing so, helped make it one of the world's great religions.

Balance of power

Roman law shaped many Western legal systems and helped inspire how modern democracies structure their governance. Rome split power across democratic, monarchical, and aristocratic elements at once — and honestly, the American system's balance of powers looks a lot like that same instinct, echoed two thousand years later.

The Romans prized bravery, loyalty, piety, respect, and authority. Roman Stoic writers such as Seneca argued that true bravery wasn't raw courage in battle, but the ability to tell good from evil and to fight for the good — courage aimed at something beyond yourself.

Health mattered too, and for a very practical reason: a "real" man cared for his health because a sick man couldn't provide stability for his family, let alone contribute to the empire's security. And respect had to be earned, through maintaining your status and performing well in roles carrying real social, economic, or political weight.

The empire of the Han Dynasty

The Han Dynasty took power in China in 206 BC, expanded into Korea and Vietnam, and held on for over four centuries — one of the longest runs of any Chinese dynasty, though the Zhou Dynasty (c. 1046–256 BC) reigned even longer. Their Confucian ideology leaned hard into piety, virtue, and moderation, which sits oddly next to how authoritarian their actual policies were. That tension, somehow, was part of what made the whole thing work.

Literacy and diligence

The Han cared deeply about culture, literacy, and recordkeeping. Their Music Bureau, the Yuefu, catalogued the music of the day in remarkable detail — instruments, songs, techniques, the lot.

That reverence for culture stands in sharp contrast to the dynasty before them, remembered mostly for burning books and destroying cultural artefacts. The Han chose the opposite path, deliberately.

The Mongol empire

Genghis Khan founded the Mongol Empire in 1206, and within a remarkably short time it became a force nobody could ignore. At its peak it ran from the Sea of Japan through Central Asia into Central Europe.

It started, like a lot of steppe empires before it, on the periphery — growing by taking Chinese territory first. On paper it was less powerful than many of its rivals, weaker in both military size and population, and yet it kept beating stronger enemies. It ended up the largest empire in history connected purely by land.

With a population well under two million — estimates run roughly 700,000 to a million — the Mongols conquered most of China, the Middle East, and Russia. Few setbacks, largely because they could field massive, mobile armies and travel with their herds — living, when needed, off horse blood mixed with water or milk.

Spiritual power, ancestor worship, and the elements

Before Buddhism, Mongol spiritual life blended ancestor worship, a strong current of shamanism, and belief in natural spirits tied to the elements — earth, fire, water. After Kublai Khan converted to Buddhism and the empire took China, much of the population followed, and Buddhism became the official religion of the Yuan Dynasty (1271–1368).

The Mongols placed real weight on sacred locations and the powers of divine beings, and on the idea of being at one with the universe.

They also observed strict taboos to stay in favor with the spirits: no shedding royal blood, no stepping on a yurt's threshold, no washing or bathing in rivers, no putting knives near a fire. These weren't minor customs — break one and the punishment could be severe, even fatal.

Social status

The Mongols buried their dead with belongings and weapons, which tells you they believed in an afterlife — and buried their leaders in opulent tombs, suggesting that afterlife was seen as a continuation of this one. Whatever status you'd earned in life, you carried with you.

Ottoman-era architecture with domes and minarets

The Ottoman empire

The Ottoman Empire hit its peak between the 16th and 17th centuries, spanning parts of Western Asia, most of Southeast Europe, and stretches of North Africa.

Science, law, Islam, and art sat at the center of Ottoman values, and you can see it in who made up the empire's highest class: poets, judges, ushers (prayer leaders in mosques), scientists.

Getting into that upper tier required three things at once: loyalty, the practice of Islam, and fluency in the Ottoman Way. You professed loyalty to the sultan and the state, accepted and practised Islam in heart and mind, and mastered a whole system of behavior, custom, and language that made up the Ottoman Way itself.

The Spanish empire

The Spanish Empire reached its greatest territorial extent in the late 18th century, sprawling across 5.3 million square miles — enormous military and economic reach, though many historians place its peak in power and wealth a century or two earlier, under the Habsburgs.

Culture and religion sat at the top of Spain's values, and nowhere is that clearer than in its "New World" missions during the colonial period. The missions had a stated sequence of goals: convert Native Americans to Christianity first, then instil Spanish culture deeply enough that the missions could become parishes in their own right. The end goal, underneath all of it, was pacifying territory for colonial purposes.

And Spain wanted territory for a very concrete reason — resources. Silver, tar, iron, tin, gold, hardwood, copper, salt. Things investors could actually exploit.

The Russian empire

At its peak in 1895, the Russian Empire spanned almost 9 million square miles. Its sheer size and reach played a real role in stopping Napoleon's army in its tracks.

Russia organized itself around three national core values: language, culture, religion. A now-famous 1833 report to Tsar Nicholas I, devised by education minister Sergey Uvarov, named three "truly Russian" principles:

  • Orthodoxy (compliance with the Christian Orthodox religion and culture)
  • Autocracy
  • Narodnost (the "national" principle, similar to nationalism)

The Russians authorised a university in Kyiv in 1833, opening its doors in 1834, specifically to spread Russian culture and language through the empire's western, Polish-populated provinces — replacing a Polish lyceum shut down after the 1830–31 uprising. The Poles had rebelled before, so Tsar Nicholas had every reason to want the measure enforced. Yet he let the Germans in the Baltic provinces keep their own culture, because they'd stayed loyal and made fine officers and officials. He even let them keep their social and cultural dominance over the Estonians and Latvians. Loyalty, it seems, bought exceptions.

The empire itself was deeply hierarchical: peasants at the bottom, then clergy and nobility, and the monarchy at the very top.

The British empire

By the early 1900s, Britain controlled almost a quarter of the planet's land — and roughly a fifth of its population, a share that crept closer to a quarter by the 1920s. Most of that territory has since become independent, and most members of today's Commonwealth of Nations are former British colonies.

A lot of what became American collective values — civil rights, the rule of law, liberalism, trade — trace straight back to Britain. The British also placed enormous value on organization, and I'd argue that's precisely what made the empire work. The Crown never had a huge army. It didn't need one. It had a well-organized one, backed by a financially strong government.

Britain's conquest of India, for instance, ran largely on payment — Indian troops chose to serve because the British offered regular pay and other benefits. That same organizational strength let Britain wage wars on multiple fronts at once, and rarely lose any of them.

The Statue of Liberty against a clear sky

Lessons for America?

The US still fields the most powerful military on Earth. It combines British resourcefulness in trade with something like Rome's cultural pull, can wreak havoc the way the Mongols once did, and has spread a universal ideology the way the Ottomans did in their day.

But here's the thing worth sitting with: Rome fell despite its military power. Persia was torn apart by internal squabbling. The Mongol Empire dissolved because its people never really settled anywhere. Britain's empire eventually burned itself out trying to uphold a global order single-handedly.

According to political scientist Francis Fukuyama, writing in The Economist, the high-water mark of "American hubris" was the 2003 invasion of Iraq — when the US set out to remake the whole Middle East, not just Iraq and Afghanistan, which it had already occupied two years earlier. It overestimated, badly, what its military could achieve in terms of lasting peace and political change.

Sources

Discover your own core values

Take the free, research-backed Values App assessment — nine minutes, max.

Discover your values